ALERT: CDC And Big Pharma Data CONFIRM That More Children Will Die From COVID Vaccines Than By The Virus Itself

(Tea Party PAC) – Since the beginning of the entire COVID charade we have known that children are at virtually zero risk from the virus while the elderly and immunocompromised are at risk, as per usual with any virus be it the flu or the Chinese coronavirus.

Yet, the push to vaccinate every single living human being on planet earth is on, which might not be such a horrible thing if the vaccines were actually safe and effective.

They are not, however, and the sad, scary reality is that many more children are going to die from the vaccines than would ever die from the virus.

Parents are eagerly offering their children up to be lab rats for Big Pharma out of fear produced by the incessant fear-mongering of the lying, corrupt media and our federal government.

The worst part is, it’s with information from the federal government’s own organization that we can safely conclude the COVID vaccines will claim far more children’s lives than the virus. They aren’t even trying to hide this data.

The truth is right out in the open for anyone to see yet many choose not to.

According to Toby Rogers, he was “reading the CDC’s “Guidance for Health Economics Studies Presented to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2019 Update” and I realized that the FDA’s woeful risk-benefit analysis in connection with Pfizer’s EUA application to jab children ages 5 to 11 violates many of the principles of the CDC’s Guidance document. The CDC “Guidance” document describes 21 things that every health economics study in connection with vaccines must do and the FDA risk-benefit analysis violated at least half of them…”

What does all of that mean, you ask? Well, as Rogers explains, the “Number Needed to Treat (NNT) in order to prevent a single case, hospitalization, ICU admission, or death, is a standard way to measure the effectiveness of any drug. It’s an important tool because it enables policymakers to evaluate tradeoffs between a new drug, a different existing drug, or doing nothing. In vaccine research the equivalent term is Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNTV, sometimes also written as NNV) in order to prevent a single case, hospitalization, ICU admission, or death (those are 4 different NNTVs that one could calculate).”

He goes on to explain that Big Pharma hates discussing these important numbers especially when it comes to COVID-19 since the NNTV is so insanely high that the “vaccine could not pass any honest risk-benefit analysis.”

Rogers cites several health economists who have done the math on the NNTV for COVID-19 vaccines and what they have found isn’t exactly promising for Big Pharma.

Ronald Brown, a Canadian health economist, estimated that the NNTV to prevent a single case of COVID is from 88 to 142, while others have calculated the NNTV to prevent a single case to be 256.

German and Dutch researchers using a large data set including 500,000 subjects from a field study in Israel have calculated an NNTV between 200 and 700 to prevent one single case using the Pfizer vaccine.

They took it a step further and determined that the “NNTV to prevent one death is between 9,000 and 100,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate.”

Rogers also included information from Robert F. Kennedy about Pfizer’s clinical trial:

In Pfizer’s 6 month clinical trial in adults — there was 1 Covid death out of 22,000 in the vaccine (“treatment”) group and 2 Covid deaths out of 22,000 in the placebo group (see Table s4). So NNTV = 22,000. The catch is there were 5 heart attack deaths in the vaccine group and only 1 in placebo group. So for every 1 life saved from Covid, the Pfizer vaccine kills 4 from heart attacks. All cause mortality in the 6 month study was 20 in vaccine group and 14 in placebo group. So a 42% all cause mortality increase among the vaccinated. The vaccine loses practically all efficacy after 6 months so they had to curtail the study. They unblinded and offered the vaccine to the placebo group. At that point the rising harm line had long ago intersected the sinking efficacy line.

In conclusion, he notes that Pfizer’s studies were done strictly on adults and that the NNTV for children will be much higher since higher NNTV are the case when the risk is lower, as it is for children. The flu, as Rogers noted, is “slightly less dangerous or roughly equivalent to the flu in children.”

After discussing his calculations he states, “So then the NNTV to prevent a single fatality in this age group is 630,775 (28,384,878 / 45). But it’s a two dose regimen so if one wants to calculate the NNTV per injection the number doubles to 1,261,550. It’s literally the worst NNTV in the history of vaccination.”

He then compares that with the deadly side effects of the vaccines on children, “Kirsch, Rose, and Crawford (2021) estimate that VAERS undercounts fatal reactions by a factor of 41 which would put the total fatal side effects in this age-range at 5,248. (Kirsch et al. represents a conservative estimate because others have put the underreporting factor at 100.)”

This would mean that Joe Biden and his regime are essentially planning to “kill 5,248 children via Pfizer mRNA shots in order to save 45 children from dying” from the virus.

“For every one child saved by the shot, another 117 would be killed by the shot.”

Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer Vice President, asserted earlier this month, “It’s a crazy thing to vaccinate (children) with something that is actually 50 times more likely to kill them than the virus itself.”

All of the data and most of the real experts are all saying one thing. These vaccines are dangerous and most certainly not worth the risk, especially not for children.

Any parent signing their children up for these shots is insane.

Copyright 2021. TeaPartyPac.org

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here