BREAKING: Biden Moves To Give WHO Health-Care Sovereignty Over America

(Tea Party PAC) – According to a new report from the folks over at WND, the Biden administration is proposing a set of new amendments to current World Health Organization regulations that would ultimately give the U.N. agency’s director-general unilateral authority to declare a health emergency in the United States.

This is not good. Biden is essentially giving away a piece of our national sovereignty to a group of individuals who were not elected by the people of the United States. Actions like this are against everything we stand for and spit in the face of our Constitution and other founding documents.

“The International Health Regulations amendments will be subject to votes at the upcoming annual meeting of the WHO’s governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly, May 22-28 in Geneva, Switzerland, warns Dr. Peter Breggin, an acclaimed reformer in the field of psychiatry, who is helping lead a campaign to raise awareness of the Biden administration’s move,” the report said.

Breggin then goes on to write that the planning for these amendments “has been so stealthy that it might have escaped attention except for the efforts of one individual,” that would be author, researcher and activist James Roguski.

Roguski owns a website that allows citizens to leave comments for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The deadline for this is Friday morning at 10 a.m. Eastern Time. There is a separate form that allows citizens to slap their John Hancock down on a petition that demands the amendments be withdrawn.

“Under the new regulations, the director-general could declare an emergency in the U.S. if he determines there is a potential health threat to other nations. Breggin notes the existing International Health Regulations are a ‘binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007,'” the report continued.

“A graduate of Harvard and Case Western Reserve Medical School, Breggin, 86, is known as the ‘conscience of psychiatry’ for his criticism of the use of drugs and electroconvulsive therapy in the field. He advocates instead ‘more effective, empathic, and ethical forms of psychological, educational, and social approaches to people with emotional suffering and disability,'” WND’s report stated.

His latest tome is titled “COVID-19 and the Global Predators: We are the Prey,” in which he fully criticizes the response to the global pandemic and takes a close examination of who profited from it.

Biden and his ilk submitted the amendments to the WHO on Jan. 18, according to the notes on Breggin’s website.

“Significantly, they override the current check on WHO power which states that the agency ‘shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring,'” the report added.

“By eliminating that, and other clauses,” Breggin went on to write, “all the shackles will be removed from the Director-General of WHO, enabling him to declare health emergencies at will.”

Breggin then wars that the “arbitrary authority to declare national emergencies will be used against the United States if our government ever again dares to take anti-globalist stands as it did under the Trump administration.”

Leo Hohmann, an investigative reporter, blasted a big spotlight on some of the other big changes that are contained in the amendments.

One of the changes included in them is the implementation of “regional” health czars who would be under the authority of WHO who would then be in charge of enforcing the United Nation’s agency policies.

“Aid can be withheld, punishing economic sanctions can be placed on any nation that deviates from the prescribed WHO remedy for whatever health emergency has been declared by the WHO director general,” Hohmann explained.

“The current director, he points out, is Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who has been criticized for allowing the Chinese Communist Party to manhandle the U.N. agency and control pandemic policies and the overall narrative, blocking investigation of COVID-19’s origin,” WND reported.

Breggin noted that the current WHO regulations provide for an 18-month grace period during which a country can withdraw its “yes” vote for the amendments.

However, this new set of proposed amendments would then shorten that period of time to six months.

“We must act now to prevent the passage of the amendments, including putting sufficient pressure on the United States to withdraw them from consideration,” Breggin stated.

“If that fails, and the amendments are approved at the May meeting of the WHO governing body, we must then make the effort to influence a majority of the nations to change their votes to ‘no,'” he added.

A total of 47 countries are in favor of Biden’s amendment, including all 27 members of the European Union.

Breggin then notes that in the foreword to WHO’s regulations, there’s no specific limit to what actually constitutes a health emergency, and thus he issues a warning that authority is not just limited to pandemics.

The scope of this authority includes an “illness or medical condition, irrespective of origin or source, that presents or could present significant harm to humans.”

“In an interview Thursday with ‘War Room,’ Breggin said the Biden administration proposals essentially make the WHO’s director-general a “dictator over health emergencies,'” the report continued.

Copyright 2022.

You may also like...


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here