Chills: National Security “Experts” Characterize Republican Party As Like “Terror Group,” “Enemy Combatants”

(Tea Party PAC) – And just like that, you became a political dissident.

If you are conservative, patriotic, believe in traditional values, and (most especially) question the results of the 2020 election, congratulations, national security “experts” now consider you to be a terrorist and enemy combatant.

Welcome to the Biden era.

An essay for The Root published this past week attacks the Republican Party as a “terror group” which is full of “terrorist sympathizers” who ought to be treated as enemy combatants.

Terrell Jermaine Starr (pictured at top) is the author of the essay, which is titled “Democrats Are Stuck With a Republican Party Rife With Conspiracy Theorists, Anarchists and Terrorist Sympathizers” and immediately launches into an attack on the party that is nothing short of hysterical, baseless garbage.

“[W]e have an entire political party that has converted into an authoritarian—albeit Americanized version—style of politics that cares nothing about U.S. democracy or anyone who is not white,” the essay unironically writes. Yes, he’s totally missing that it is the Democrats who are screaming for violations of personal liberty, mask mandates and COVID-19 lockdowns, and everyone right-wing of Bill Maher to be treated like a social pariah.

Or terrorist, if Starr has his way.

He describes the GOP as “a party of turncoats” who “basically sat by and said nothing” to counter “lies” he was shamefully subject to listen to during the Democrats’ sham impeachment last week, which he apparently had expected to simply not include the defense’s perspective and rather for the whole Republican Party to simply tar and feather the Trump attorneys to symbolize their full and complete loyalty to Dear Leader Biden.

“The Republican Party is functioning like a terror cell,” Starr’s unhinged rant continues.

A bunch of leftist “experts” begin to firm up Starr’s crazy theory.

Former Democrat congressional candidate Pam Keith, a US Navy veteran, was quoted as saying:

“The only way a country like ours survives is through mutual agreement to set a standard. That’s what the Constitution is. That’s what the rule of law is. If you don’t have that, then there’s no incentive to peacefully allow the other sides to exercise power.”

Hmm…let’s apply this to some other hot-button social issues, shall we? Racism? Abortion? Free speech? Civil liberties?

Where’s the standard gone there, as it’s certainly no longer applied equally to all Americans.

Earlier this month, Keith, who apparently has super high standards, compared Trump to Osama bin Laden. Back in 2019, she called for women to simply stop sleeping with conservative men—so she’s clearly totally grounded and should be taken super seriously as a social commentator.

“We still have this delusion of bipartisanship, Keith said. “There’s no f*cking bipartisanship. Get off that ship. It does not work. It’s sinking. It’s done. It’s at the bottom of the ocean. It’s the fucking Titanic. It’s down in the water. Let it go.”

Kyle Bibby, a former Marine Corps Infantry officer and the national campaign manager at Common Defense, said that if the Capitol Hill rioters had been in Afghanistan, they could have been “hit.”

“We would’ve hit them,” he said. “Either a raid, drop a bomb on them, whatever it is.”

Imagine for one moment if a conservative said that about BLM.


Twitter users, as you can imagine, were shocked by the outrageous slander of regular, everyday Americans who simply disagree with claims about the election or want to preserve our country and its values.

Featured image credit: Atlantic Council

Copyright 2021.


  1. Here is an example of a terrorist document that many patriots will recognize, but will doubtless seem very alien and frightening to many leftist democrats today:
    – – –
    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their Creator, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.

    That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

    Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
    – – – –
    This is the kind of stuff that terrorizes tyrants and tyrant wannabes. Lock & Load. 🙂


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here