(Tea Party PAC) – Liberals in the government have been non-stop harping on President Trump claiming he did a “quid pro quo” with Ukraine as a means of digging up dirt on a political rival to help win the 2020 presidential election.
The evidence for this is extremely thin, essentially non-existent, a fact that hasn’t escaped the attention of anyone who has actually been looking at this whole impeachment fiasco with even microscopic objectivity.
However, former National Security Council official Dr. Fiona Hill has revealed who really did do some shady business to Ukraine and it isn’t Trump. It’s former President Barack Obama who she alleges withheld weapons from the country for political reasons.
Here’s more from Breitbart:
Under questioning from Republicans, Hill admitted that she herself had been against giving weapons to Ukraine to help it fight Russian invasion, and that she had written an op-ed in the Washington Post expressing those views.
She also said that the “interagency consensus” had actually been in favor of arming the Ukrainians; she herself was not in government service at the time, but working at the liberal Brookings Institution think tank.
Hill noted that President Obama had ignored the “interagency consensus” for what she called “political” reasons. She explained that Obama was concerned that arming the Ukrainians could provoke the Russians.
On Tuesday, Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who worked for Hill and remains at the National Security Council, testified that President Donald Trump’s decision to withhold aid from Ukraine temporarily went against the “interagency consensus” on Ukraine, though he also acknowledged that Trump had armed Ukraine while Obama had not.
Democrats say that Trump hurt U.S. national security by jeopardizing American support for Ukraine, and ignoring the “interagency consensus,” for what they claim are political reasons.
The question now becomes why in the world no one threw a fit over Obama’s abuse of power with Ukraine and demanded he be impeached and removed from office? The left claims the reason they are pursuing this whole impeachment matter against President Trump is because what he’s doing is unethical and illegal.
They act as if they are righteous and upholding truth and justice. If so, why did none of these individuals raise a stink when Obama stepped over the line? He clearly did something they would say is illegal, so why not go after him and uphold the integrity of the office?
Ladies and gentlemen, this is hypocrisy at its finest. The left is not going after Trump for some higher purpose, but to get him removed from office so they can waltz into the White House in 2020. Or so they think.
It’s an attempt at a coup, and erasure of the voices of millions of American citizens who chose Trump to be their president.
This is an unprecedented time in the life of our country, and if we allow the left to get away with targeting the president and having him removed over their flimsy allegations, we are effectively submitting to the rule of oppressive, liberty-hating progressives who want to destroy our way of life.
Let’s not allow that to happen.