(Tea Party PAC) – Is everyone working for the Trump administration trustworthy? Or have some dropped the ball?
This is a vital question to consider when we examine the fact that Pompeo was presented with vital data which could help unravel the Obamagate scandal, and appears to have failed to taken action.
In 2017, a group of over 20 US intelligence, military, and diplomatic veterans concluded that the notorious DNC email hack in 2016 was not, in fact, a hack.
The Gateway Pundit explains that rather, these experts determined that the emails had been copied by someone on the East Coast.
Current Secretary of State Mike Pompeo received this information, but to date, TGP states, this he never followed up with President Trump.
A number of veteran intelligence officials (VIPS) have been poking forks into the red herring of “Russian pre-2016-election hacking of the DNC emails” for the past three and a half years. In the process, they called attention to the tarnished reputation of CrowdStrike, a viscerally anti-Russian cyber-security firm that has had to retract erroneous forensic findings in the past. They also noted that CrowdStrike was paid by the Democrats; and that, instead of ordering the FBI to investigate, former and now fired FBI Director James Comey chose to defer to CrowdStrike to look into the alleged Russian “hack”.
The VIPS published in public sources, claims that (1) the Democratic National Committee was not hacked by the Russians in 2016, and (2) that the Democratic National Committee data was “leaked” and not “hacked”. Three key Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) Memoranda were produced for the President (two went to Barack Obama and one to President Donald Trump).
The VIPS claims they applied the principles of physics and forensic science to show that the DNC emails were leaked in spring 2016 — not given to WikiLeaks via a hack by Russia or by anyone else. For the past three years, they have been trying to call attention to their findings.
In the second referenced Memoranda was addressed to President Obama on January 17, 2017, entitled “A Key Issue [namely, Russian ‘hacking’ given to WikiLeaks] That Still Needs to be Resolved”. The following day Obama actually addressed that issue at a press conference, when he conceded that the intelligence community had no idea how the DNC emails reached WikiLeaks.
It was startling that Obama injected his surprising disclaimer into that press conference two days before he left town.
The VIPS also provided a Memorandum to President Obama on December 12, 2016, entitled “Allegations of Hacking Election Are Baseless”. The VIPS shared that the evidence they had could save Congress from “partisanship, expense, and unnecessary delay.” That time, Obama chose not to listen.
President Trump, on the other hand, was apparently was listening to what the VIPS share with him their third Memorandum noted above — “Was the Russian ‘Hack’ an Inside Job?” (July 24, 2017).
In this document, the VIPS stated that the January 6  “Intelligence Community Assessment” by “hand-picked” analysts from the FBI, CIA, and NSA seems to fit into the same agenda-driven category as the ‘Russia hacked the DNC’ fairy tale. It was largely based on an “assessment,” not supported by any apparent evidence, that a shadowy entity with the moniker “Guccifer 2.0” hacked the DNC on behalf of Russian intelligence and gave DNC emails to WikiLeaks.
The VIPS forensic findings mentioned above put a huge dent in the Intel Community’s assessment and cast serious doubt on the underpinnings of the extraordinarily successful campaign to blame the Russian government for hacking. The VIPS claim that neither former CIA Director John Brennan, nor the cyber-warriors who worked for him, have been completely candid regarding how this all went down.
After receiving the VIPS report, President Trump ordered then-CIA Director Mike Pompeo to invite Bill Binney to CIA Headquarters to brief him on the findings. Binney did so on October 24, 2017, with his typically no-holds-barred explanation of the group’s findings and of how Pompeo’s subordinates were being less than candid.
Here is Binney discussing his observations:
NSA Whistleblower and longtime intelligence analyst Bill Binney on continuation of #RussiaGate fever: "The problem with the Mueller Report & the Rosenstein indictment is it's based on lies."
— Status Coup (@StatusCoup) June 3, 2019
They go on to explain that, to date, there is no sign that the Secretary of State followed-up, either by examining the matter with his own personnel or by providing President Trump with a report on his meeting with Binney.
However, there is hope yet.
The January 6, 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment is now enjoying fresh scrutiny. In the document, which was requested by Obama and put together quickly by then-CIA chief John Brennan, asserted that Russia wanted President Trump to win the 2016 election.
It is now rumored to be a key focus in the Durham investigation into the origins of the Russia hoax investigation.
So this is very good news.
Appearances may be deceiving. While it may seem that Pompeo dropped the ball, he could have passed on the VIPS information to the president unbeknownst to us, and we soon could get to the bottom of this whole, scandalous, Deep State mess.