John Solomon Just Destroyed Vindman’s Testimony, Issues This Challenge To NSC Leaker

(Tea Party PAC) – Esteemed political reporter John Solomon has completely dismantled the testimony of Alexander Vindman, the National Security Council official who appeared before the House Intelligence Committee this week to present his incredibly weak case for the mythical “quid pro quo” the Democrats are making in an attempt to impeach Trump.

This was warranted, considering Vindman’s testimony referenced Solomon’s reporting.

So Solomon hit back.


In a Friday post, Solomon noted that “under oath to Congress, [Vindman] asserted all the factual elements in my columns at The Hill about Ukraine were false, except maybe my grammar.”

Vindman was pressed on this point by Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY), who tried to clarify if “when you say key elements, are you referring to everything John Solomon stated or just some of it?”

“All the elements that I just laid out for you. The criticisms of corruption were false…,” Vindman had replied. “Were there more items in there, frankly, congressman? I don’t recall. I haven’t looked at the article in quite some time, but you know, his grammar might have been right.”

Solomon called Vindman’s testimony as “injurious to my reputation” and proceeded to lay out 28 “primary factual elements in my Ukraine column.”

With links to his sources and the origin of his information, Solomon provided details on his own reporting which have played a prominent role in the impeachment proceedings even as the Democrats try to discredit him.

Biz Pac review notes:

From the conflict of interest by former Vice President Joe Biden as his son Hunter was hired by the Ukrainian natural gas company, Burisma, which was under investigation for corruption, to the subsequent firing of Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin when he pushed to interview Hunter Biden as part of his investigation.

The senior Biden, serving as former President Obama’s vice president at the time, boasted in 2018 that he had gotten Shokin fired after threatening to withhold $1 billion in U.S. aid – and there is video to prove it.

Solomon finished off his post with a challenge to Vindman, declaring “if you have information that contradicts any of these 28 factual elements in my columns I ask that you make it publicly available. Your testimony did not.”

“If you don’t have evidence these 28 facts are wrong, I ask that you correct your testimony because any effort to call factually accurate reporting false only misleads America and chills the free debate our Constitutional framers so cherished to protect,” he wrote.


Solomon’s work is a must-read for anyone who wants to wrap their head around the extent of corruption and collusion between the Democrats and Ukraine.

Many Twitter users noted that his work is clearly posing a threat to the left.


  1. There is something going on with this ltc. Where is his bronze star, he got wounded in war and is a officer? 99.1 % of all officers get a bronze star fo being in a war zone. Even clerks. must see all of his OER’s, bet they’re not good. just saying, not enough ribbons for a LTC, in war time. Just look at his peers, they say he is a chow theift.

    14 year vet, desert storm iraqie free

  2. One simple question America?

    How do we let a officer of the US military, who was officered a chanced to be the defense mister in the foreign country where he is serving, represent us in anyway.

    Does something smell of ( “cough”) treason?

    Our founding fathers are crying.

  3. My Fellow Americans

    Just a couple of comments to bring a few of my fellow Americans up to date on goings on in the federal government since the departure of Ronald Reagan (please note, I left active military duty the year before Ronny left). Can’t speak for all of the swamp’s current personnel policies, but a couple I will mention might give you some insight as to why so many members of the military officers’ corps keep stepping in something and/or tripping over their own lips. First, certain officers selected for O-4 (major/lieutenant commander) are offered a lobotomy, supposedly to clear their minds of any matter that might cause independent thinking. Officers selected for O-6 (colonel/captain) are offered a flapotomy (a procedure in which a flap is cut in the abdomen with surgical Velcro applied in such a manner that the officer can drop the flap in order to see where they are going with their head up their rectum). Finally those officers selected for O-7 (brigadier general/rear admiral) are sent to a sailing course at the Naval Academy where they are taught the fine art/skill of tacking into both starboard and port winds. Hope this explains some of the reasons the leadership coming from most of the officer corps for the last 30 odd years has been marginal at best. The only thing they have excelled at is turning what should be short aggressive skirmishes with clearly defined objectives into long draw out fiascos designed to line the pockets of the military industrial complex and their favorite politicians!



  5. Vindman forgot that it was John and Sara Carter who brought this information to us. The way this guy was coached they must have been afraid to mention Sara.
    How stupid these Demo-rats have shown themselves to be. Then again they are playing to 50% of the country that have not a clue and only hear FAKE NEWS SOUNDBITES.
    I say to them WAKE UP. God Bless John, & Sara.

  6. I’m still at a loss as to why the Secretary of the Army has not brought charges against this Officer. His gross breaches of military conduct are epic. The American people should demand that the Secretary of the Army bring charges immediately as is required by the UCMJ. His failure shows he’s not fit to serve as the leader of the U.S. Army. Charge this Officer or resign your from your office.

  7. This Lt. Col. Misused his uniform, his uniform of the day would have been a business suite which is what he would be wearing to preform his job, he did not follow his chain of command, he lied under oath. He is a disgrace to the military and should be court marshaled, stripped of his rank, and receives no pension.

    • Andrew, do you understand what treason is? I’m thinking you don’t, because if you did, you wouldn’t be accusing those that testified of treason. You may disagree with their testimony, and it may very well be full of untruths, but their testimonies don’t even come close to treason.

  8. Vindman obviously hadn’t a clue as to what he was talking about, he had been given information by the SCHIFF and the corrupt democrats and he failed to remember the details plus he is also a traitor to both Trump and American people, he is a disgrace to the armed forces and the flag he swore ALLEGIANCE TO, he must be stripped of his rank and kicked out without his pension or otherwise, HE IS A DISGRACE TO THE UNIFORM HE WORE at his questioning, I believe he is part and parcel of the WHISTLEBLOWER THEORY and is himself involved in the impeachment process.

  9. I g­­­­e­­­­t p­­­­a­­­­i­­­­d o­­­­v­­­­e­­­­r $­­9­­0 p­­­­e­­­­r h­­­­o­­­­u­­­­r w­­­­o­­­­r­­k­­­­i­­­­n­­­­g f­­­­r­­­­o­­­­m h­­­­o­­­­m­­­­e w­­­­i­­­­t­­­­h 2 k­­­­i­­d­­­­s a­­­­t h­­­­o­­­­m­­­­e. I n­­­­e­­­­v­­­­e­­r t­­­­h­­o­­­­u­­­­g­­­­h­­­­t I­­­­’­­­­d b­­­­e a­­­­b­­­­l­­­­e t­­­­o d­­­­o i­­­­t b­­­­u­­­­t m­­­­y b­­­­e­­­­s­­­­t f­­r­­i­­e­­n­­d e­­a­­r­­n­­s o­­v­­e­­r 1­­0­­k a m­­o­­n­­t­­h d­­o­­i­­n­­g t­­h­­­­i­­­­s a­­­­n­­­­d s­­­­h­­­­e c­­­­o­­­­n­­­­v­­­­i­­­­n­­­­c­­­­e­­­­d m­­­­e t­­­­o t­­r­­y. T­­h­­e p­­o­­t­­e­­n­­t­­i­­a­­l w­­i­­t­­h t­­h­­i­­s i­­s e­­n­­­­d­­l­­e­­­­s­­­­s. H­­­­e­­­­r­­­­e­­­­s w­­­­h­­­­a­­­­t I’v­­­­e b­­­­e­­­­e­­­­n d­­­­o­­­­i­­­­n­­­­g, <3
    🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:) $ ℳ
    HERE →→→→→→ W­­­­w­­­­w.­­­­w­­­­o­­­­r­­­­k­­­­b­­­­a­­­­a­­­­r­­­­.C­­­­o­­­­m

  10. John,
    Your reporting has always been top drawer.

    Please don’t let this punk get away with it.

    Sue him like Nunes just did to CNN for false reporting.

    The more suits, (hopefully) the less incorrect reporting. When their pocket gets hit, it becomes meaningful

    I am so sick of the media’s lies

  11. Vindman is a disgrace to the uniform that he parades himself around in to protect himself from criticism when he is near people that know exactly who he really is….


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here