
(Tea Party PAC) – Democrats are desperately trying every strategy they can think of to federalize elections effectively bringing an end to our Republic as we know it.
Right when we thought we were safe thanks to Democrat Senators Joe Manchin (WV) and Krysten Sinema (AZ) refusal to support doing away with the filibuster the Democrats seem to have hatched yet another plan to forever change the US.
According to a report from The Hill, Democrats are now considering a new strategy in the hopes of passing their so-called “voting rights” package.
Democrat Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia told reporters that he and some colleagues are considering forcing Republicans to hold the Senate floor with arguments in hopes that they will grow tired and allow Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer to call for a simple-majority vote.
“There are a couple of paths here,” Kaine said. “Do we go down the path and do a long debate until it’s done and then have a simple debate?”
“We wouldn’t need a rules change to pass the bill by simple majority if the debate is over. Theoretically, you do not need a rules change to pass a bill that’s on the floor, you just have to allow debate to occur.”
The Hill points out that Kaine is correct according to the strict definition of the rules. The 60-vote requirement is for the cloture vote to end debate but a simple majority could be used if the debate has been concluded.
This strategy, however, has not been used in decades and is unlikely to succeed as long as Senator Ted Cruz remains in the Senate. The Hill reports that Senate members have simply assumed the floor is “being tied up in debate when a controversial bill is pending.”
Senate procedure expert James Wallner said it would be possible for Democrats to pass the package with a simple majority by enforcing a strict definition of the Senate rules.
“The easiest way to get to final passage on this bill is to put it on the floor and have Vice President Kamala Harris or Majority Leader Schumer or any other senator start to make points of order against any senator who tries to speak more than twice,” Wallner said.
According to The Hill, Wallner was referring to Senate Rule XIX, which states that “no senator shall speak more than twice upon any one question in debate on the same legislative day without leave of the Senate.”
This rule has apparently not been enforced according to an anonymous Senate Democrat aide who seemed much less optimistic about the Democrats’ chances of passing the package with a simple majority.
“This requires a more aggressive presiding officer,” the aide said. “The parliamentarian is not going to advise the presiding officer, ‘Nobody seems to be seeking debate so bring the question.’ It will have to be affirmatively sought by the presiding officer.”
The aide also added that Republicans could pretty easily circumvent the two-speech rule by simply bringing up new motions to change the bills.
“The two-speech rule is hard to make work because you can always offer another amendment or bring up a new debate proposition and then get two more speeches out of that,” the aide said.
“And once again, the parliamentarian doesn’t look to enforce it again, so it would have to be the presiding officer causing the parliamentarian to do something they don’t traditionally do.”
Constantly offering amendments would allow Republicans to keep the debate going for weeks or longer resulting in an ongoing stalemate. That is the reason why the Senate adopted the practice of assuming a cloture vote is needed to avoid weeks of endless debating.
If Democrats employed this strategy it wouldn’t be the so-called “nuclear option” because there would be no changes to Senate rules. It would, however, have the same effect in that Democrats would be ignoring decades of precedent and passing major legislation with only 51 votes.
Democrats just can’t seem to come to terms with the fact that the vast majority of Americans just don’t support their massive overreach and radical agenda.
Azsos Elections Manual pg 97. @MaricopaVote Was this properly secured and permanently identified? @brnoforaz @BarnettforAZhttps://t.co/6xXQRZi3CW
— We the People AZ Alliance (@WethePeopleAZA1) January 5, 2022
Hey MCTEC, do we always disassemble "certified" election equipment and leave it sit around for days? @brnoforaz @ConradsonJordan @FannKfann pic.twitter.com/jizit5X8QG
— We the People AZ Alliance (@WethePeopleAZA1) January 5, 2022
Didn’t Maricopa County say it was everyone else’s fault for not notifying them? https://t.co/5qXH2ja7Lt
— Karen Fann (@FannKfann) October 12, 2021
Explosive hearing happening now in Wisconsin, on how Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's CTCL interfered in the 2020 Election. Tune in to @OANN!
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) December 8, 2021
In Wisconsin, there are 119,283 "active voters" who have been registered for over 100 years!
The number is over 500K when you add in inactive voters
Third world country voter registrations! pic.twitter.com/ckhWKY7rjs
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) December 8, 2021
PLUS
9,700 active voters registered prior to 2016 and never voted in any election, appeared as voting in 2020
Another 1,500 registered prior to 2011 and never voted, but are listed as voting in 2020
"Very unusual red flag, may indicate that votes are being cast in their names" pic.twitter.com/d4ubfALlKG
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) December 8, 2021
"The irregularities and red flags indicate a huge potential for nefarious actors to access the WI Voter Registration system and allow them to manipulate any voter's status."
Wisconsin officials gave this access to Mark Zuckerberg's Dem operatives! pic.twitter.com/Bo1Gi9c5AX
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) December 8, 2021
https://twitter.com/SlayerWolf11/status/1466126593546358784?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1466126593546358784%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fuv1.e9a.myftpupload.com%2Fred-alert-wisconsin-election-hearing-reveals-119283-active-voters-who-have-been-registered-for-over-100-years-video-472473%2F
The Wisconsin Election Commission admitted it told election officials to break the law before and after the 2020 election
"I have had discomfort…the day I had first suggested this that we will be essentially telling the clerks to break the law." pic.twitter.com/9FVZtKXQqS
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) November 16, 2021
The Wisconsin Election Commission voted 5-1 to order nursing homes to break election laws during a Zoom meeting that was only posted to the public 1 hour before the vote pic.twitter.com/Eb0wU2yk2o
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) November 16, 2021
Only one commissioner was concerned about ordering nursing homes to BREAK THE LAW
"The thing I'm afraid of is possible fraud in nursing homes…where you have whomever filling out these ballots…I think that's a problem."
That's exactly what happened!pic.twitter.com/AbtHmfXSto
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) November 16, 2021
Wisconsin Election Commission knew they were breaking the law, but did it anyway
WEC admitted Special Voting Deputies have to visit nursing homes & be witnessed by Dem & GOP observers, & "the law prevents absentee ballots from being mailed" to nursing homes without SVD visits pic.twitter.com/LxryuIBSsy
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) November 16, 2021
WEC suggested letting nursing home staff help residents with ballots, even though that is against "the way the law stands"
After WEC ordered nursing homes to break the law and not to let Special Voting Deputies in that's exactly what happened – staff filled out ballots for them pic.twitter.com/DO6PhiULtx
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) November 16, 2021
Wisconsin Election Commission literally told the state to BREAK ELECTION LAWS
"The other thing we did was told municipalities they didn't have to follow the state law when they were going to propose closing a polling place…
"We need to go back to following the law but…" pic.twitter.com/5SKHPHwlff
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) November 16, 2021
The elderly mother's right to register to vote were REVOKED 5 years before the 2020 election after developing a degenerative brain disorder
Yet the son discovered his mother had “cast ballots in the Aug 11, 2020, Partisan Primary and the Nov 2020 General Election.”
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) November 16, 2021
Copyright 2022. TeaPartyPac.org