BOMBSHELL: ‘Widespread Election Fraud’ Revealed

(Tea Party PAC) – Time and time again, President Donald Trump has stated that the 2020 election was stolen from him. And there has been a mountain of evidence that has surfaced since then that points to that being the truth. And yet, no one in the media, aside from already conservative leaning sources, has bothered to investigate this evidence to see whether or not it is authentic.

In fact, judges have tossed out dozens of court cases involving issues with the election and its results without really addressing the claims that were made in them.

Joe Biden only “won” the race by a very slim margin by taking swing states where these cases originated from. Something smells fishy, but the left is plugging their noses and ignoring it all.

The best defense the radical left has put forward in arguments concerning the legitimacy of the vote count has always consisted of the statement that there’s been no “widespread election fraud” uncovered.

Until now.

According to WND, “Margot Cleveland, a graduate of Notre Dame Law, a former law clerk for a federal appellate judge and a senior contributor to The Federalist, pointed out that’s exactly what the Wisconsin Office of Special Counsel concluded was involved in that state’s 2020 presidential election results from nursing homes.”

She then went on to report, “Special Counsel Michael Gableman, the retired state Supreme Court justice appointed by the Wisconsin Assembly to investigate integrity concerns about the 2020 election, vetted more than 90 nursing homes in five different counties before concluding there was ‘widespread election fraud at Wisconsin nursing homes in November of 2020.'”

Cleveland then explains, “According to the report, nursing home staff and administrators illegally handled absentee ballots, illegally assisted with ‘marking’ residents’ ballots, illegally ‘witnessed’ the voting, and possibly included forgery of the elderly residents’ signatures. Under Wisconsin law, these violations of the election code constitute fraud.”

Patricia Hanson, the district attorney, then stated she did not have jurisdiction and would not be filing any charges.

That came after Sgt. Michael Luell, the sheriff’s investigator, went on to explain that the only legal way for residents living in residential care homes to cast a ballot requires municipalities to send two special voting deputies, who must personally deliver ballots, which can be filled out by the voter themselves with help from a relative or an SVD. The deputies are then required to seal the ballot and deliver it to an elections clerk.

“The Ridgewood Care Center in Racine County violated every one of those mandates, Luell explained, with the Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) holding blame for the blatant disregard of state election law taking place at residential facilities because the commission had directed municipalities not to ‘use the Special Voting Deputy process to service residents in care facilities,’ and to instead ‘transmit absentee ballots to those voters by mail,'” The Federalist report stated.

“Schmaling had warned it was unlikely the problems developed in only one nursing home, and Gableman confirmed that, exposing ‘rampant fraud and abuse occurred statewide at Wisconsin’s nursing homes and other residential care facilities in relation to absentee voting at these facilities,'” the report continued.

Gableman’s report then cited the “improbably high voting rates” of 100 percent in many of the care facilities “alone creates a strong inference of fraud.”

How in the world did these facilities manage to have a 100 percent voting rate? That’s totally impossible. It seems pretty evident from just this bit alone that there was voter fraud happening in the 2020 presidential election. And yet, judges tossed out cases left and right. Unbelievable.

“Gableman cited Resident D of Brown County. Her family took Resident D to vote at her assigned polling location, but when she presented herself to vote on election day, the election workers informed her she had already voted. After questioning from her family, Resident D recalled someone at the nursing home had talked with her about voting, but she denied voting at the residential facility. Nonetheless, records from 2020 show Resident D cast an absentee ballot, the report explained,” WND says.

Send a Thankyou

Gableman discovered that close to 92,000 individuals in the state of Wisconsin live in these kind of facilities, so the total failure of election officials in the state to “prevent wards and incapacitated persons from voting in the 2020 presidential election” casts tremendous “doubt on the election result,” Gableman stated.

“WND reported, too, when Gableman’s report came out that it found that Mark Zuckerberg’s decision to donate some $420 million to various leftist elections officials across America to ‘help’ them accommodate COVID during the 2020 presidential race violated Wisconsin’s bribery statute,” the report continues.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s $9 million in Wisconsin went “solely to five Democratic strongholds” and the report from the special counsel to the Wisconsin Assembly went on to say the actions violated the state’s ban on bribes.

Here are some other recommendations from Gableman’s report:

-Eliminating the Wisconsin Election Commission, which, in fact, had delivered to elections officials improper instructions for the election.

-Maintain a single statewide voter registration database and making it available and secure.

-Establishing oversight procedures for elections.

-Establishing a process for challenging results.

-Minimizing “pre-voting,” because that denies citizens their right to observe the process.

-Allowing the creation of “alternative slates of electors” for challenged races.

-Providing ways to challenge those certifications.

-Banning “outside funding” in elections.

When you study Zuckerberg’s money donations during the 2020 presidential election, it concludes that the results of the race were basically bought for Joe Biden. Many states and local election officials tossed out their own laws regarding mail-in ballots in order to accommodate coronavirus restrictions, actions that were not allowed legally speaking.

Both legacy and social media worked together to hide accurate and damaging information concerning Joe Biden and his family having connections to overseas business schemes right before the election took place.

A study that was conducted by the Media Research Center revealed that had those reports been widely published, enough voters would have stopped supporting Biden to have cost him the election.

Let that sink in for a bit.

Copyright 2022. TeaPartyPac.org