(Tea Party PAC) – Senate confirmation hearings for Joe Biden’s Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson kicked off Monday morning with a bang, as Senate Judiciary ranking member Chuck Grassley, a Republican from Iowa, stated on Monday that the White House is covering up a total of 48,000 documents on her.
According to The Gateway Pundit, “Grassley expressed his disappointment for being unable to obtain Judge Jackson’s documents from her time as the Vice Chair of the US Sentencing Commission that are required to be released.”
Democrats are, of course, taking action to try and stonewall Republican efforts to their hands on Jackson’s documents. Certainly seems like they are afraid for the American people to see what’s in these documents, doesn’t it? Usually, that does not bode well.
“The Obama White House sent us roughly 68,000 pages of material, but more than 38,000 of the 68,000 pages are repeated copies…” Grassley went on to say.
He then went on to add, “The White House has still withheld 48,000 pages under the presidential records and FOIA exemption — now that’s a lot of hiding.”
.@ChuckGrassley: "Only 16,000 of 68,000 [documents] that we received from the White House aren't obviously useless like all the other documents we received." pic.twitter.com/AQQ9R4RxpP
— America Rising Squared (@ARSquared) March 21, 2022
One of the biggest challenges that faces Jackson, according to a report from Infowars, is the fact that she possess a 25-year history of advocating for less punishment and jail time for sexual predators of children.
“Appearing on Steve Bannon’s ‘War Room’ on Monday, Davis explained that the left attempts to characterize criticism of Jackson’s questionable record as ‘smears’ are unfounded, because Jackson’s own lengthy record speaks for itself,” the report said.
“Ketanji Brown Jackson has a 25-year history of advocating for less punishment for sexual predators of kids,” Davis stated, pointing out Jackson’s Harvard Law School publication which argued that sex offender registry laws are unconstitutional.
Davis then went on to point out how Jackson, when served as Vice Chair of the Sentencing Commission, directed the commission to look into child pornography cases, which make up less than 2 percent of the federal crime docket.
“She took it on her own initiative to look into these federal sentences for people who possess and distribute child pornography,” he continued, going on to add that pointing these examples out is “not a smear.”
“It’s her public record,” Davis proclaimed. “It’s her public statements, it’s transcripts of her hearings at the Sentencing Commission.”
“Davis then outlined at least 7 instances of Jackson as a federal judge going soft on child sex predators, including ‘one instance where the guy should have gotten up to 120 years in prison — she gave him 3 months,'” the report revealed.
I’ve been researching the record of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, reading her opinions, articles, interviews & speeches. I’ve noticed an alarming pattern when it comes to Judge Jackson’s treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children
— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) March 16, 2022
As far back as her time in law school, Judge Jackson has questioned making convicts register as sex offenders – saying it leads to “stigmatization and ostracism.” She’s suggested public policy is driven by a “climate of fear, hatred & revenge” against sex offenders pic.twitter.com/2QUcPOnWPR
— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) March 16, 2022
Judge Jackson has said that some people who possess child porn “are in this for either the collection, or the people who are loners and find status in their participation in the community.” What community would that be? The community of child exploiters? pic.twitter.com/JDxqf9Q1AH
— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) March 16, 2022
WATCH: Senator @HawleyMO describes seven cases where Kentaji Brown Jackson gave lenient sentences that were far below federal guidelines to defendants in child pornography cases.
pic.twitter.com/oc1NIPpiuN— X Strategies LLC (@XStrategiesLLC) March 21, 2022
Is this really the kind of person we want to have a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land? Someone who would not stick up for the most vulnerable citizens in our nation?
I don’t think so.
Copyright 2022. TeaPartyPac.org
