Mark Of The Beast 1 Step Closer

(PCC)In a shocking revelation, it has come to light the federal government has surreptitiously obtained the biometric data of every single American citizen and now they are going to use it, but don’t worry it will be for your own good!

This invasive collection of personal information has been sourced from various databases, including the Medical Insurance Bureau (MIB), medical records, and even DNA-matching ancestry services.

In their most recent scheme, Washington is attempting to establish a connection between your smartphone and all forms of communication. But that’s not the end of it—your smartphone biometrics will be stored on the chip in your device.

It is no secret our society has become heavily reliant on these devices, which have become an integral part of our daily lives. However, it is crucial to approach this matter with caution and consider the spiritual and ethical implications associated with these actions.

When the time comes for a phone upgrade or replacement, many individuals opt for a simple removal and transfer of their data into a new smartphone or suitable receptive host, you!

In a stunning development, the smartphone chip is set to undergo a radical transformation, catering to the ever-increasing demands of convenience. This groundbreaking innovation aims to seamlessly integrate with the human body, enabling effortless implantation without any risk of rejection. This groundbreaking technology far exceeds the current chips implanted in animals and beloved family pets by several magnitudes.

In a future where technology continues to advance at an unprecedented rate, it is not inconceivable to envision a world where smartphones, once considered indispensable, may become obsolete.

This paradigm shift in the technological landscape will open the door to a revolutionary concept: a fully integrated micro-communication system implanted directly into the human body.

In a shocking and alarming move, the government is now proposing the implementation of a mandatory identification system which would require individuals to bear a small permanent tattoo. This Orwellian measure, justified under the guise of ‘identity purposes only,’ is a clear violation of our fundamental rights and a dangerous encroachment on personal freedom.

The shocking truth has finally emerged – these supposedly protective chips, touted as guardians of our identity, have turned out to be nothing more than insidious two-way chips. In a shocking revelation, it has come to light these biometric devices not only store detailed personal information but also may have the capability to transmit data and microprogramming directly into the host, which happens to be none other than you, the unsuspecting individual.

This raises serious concerns about privacy and the potential for unauthorized access to our personal lives. This covert operation involves the insidious manipulation of individuals’ subconscious minds through remote programming.

If you dare to brush this off as mere science fiction or a baseless conspiracy theory, I implore you to open your eyes to the imminent implementation of phase two. After the controversial and ethically questionable phase one, which shamelessly involved the cruel practice of animal testing, we now witness the continuation of this disturbing experiment in phase two, which is YOU!

The insidious progression begins with the ubiquitous smartphone, paving the way for the ominous implanted chip, ultimately culminating in the chilling reality of a number branded upon both your wrist and forehead.  The Alarming Push for a ‘Potentially Invasive Digital ID Tied to Your Smartphone.

Think this is all fear mongering and paranoid, then think again and read this update and decide for yourself.


The left-wing agenda to digitize human beings gains momentum. In a recent House Financial Services Committee hearing, the alarming push for the digitization of human beings by Democrats reached a disturbing crescendo. Astonishingly, these left-leaning politicians shamelessly advocated for the implementation of digital ID and central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). These discussions have brought to the forefront the alarming ramifications of these technologies, particularly in relation to the erosion of privacy, the expansion of surveillance, and the encroachment of government control.

The left-wing agenda to digitize human beings gains momentum.

<blockquote class=”twitter-tweet” data-media-max-width=”560″><p lang=”en” dir=”ltr”>Democrat Lawmaker Pushes for “Secure Digital ID Biometrically Synced to Your Smartphone”<br>Several Democrats praised digital ID and CBDCs during a recent hearing<br>Digital IDs received an enthusiastic endorsement from Rep. Bill Foster (D-Il), who positioned them as a way to mitigate… <a href=””></a></p>&mdash; Camus (@newstart_2024) <a href=””>December 16, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=”” charset=”utf-8″></script>

Rep. Bill Foster (D-IL), a staunch advocate for digital IDs, passionately highlighted their crucial role in addressing the potential dangers posed by artificial intelligence (AI). Foster lauded the commendable efforts of countries such as India, Estonia, and Korea in implementing digital ID systems. These systems have emerged as a promising solution to remotely authenticate individuals, leading to significant cost savings, curbing fraudulent activities, and safeguarding against the perils of deep fake identity fraud.

Foster’s endorsement has ignited a firestorm of concern, as critics argue  he conveniently sidestepped the pressing controversies surrounding digital ID systems in India. These systems have become a hotbed of privacy concerns, financial blacklisting, and mandatory participation, leading to widespread public outrage. It is disheartening to witness Foster’s failure to address these crucial issues, which are of paramount importance to the citizens of India.

Despite the claims made by proponents of these systems, such as in Estonia and Korea, the harsh reality is quite different.

Estonia, for instance, has gone so far as to impose a mandatory requirement for digital IDs on its citizens right from the moment of birth.

In a recent discussion, Charles Vice, the Director of Financial Technology and Access at the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), shed light on the agency’s diligent examination of digital ID technology.

This evaluation is a crucial step in ensuring the security and integrity of our financial systems. He praised the implementation of mobile digital driver’s licenses in various states across the United States. However, he voiced his dismay at the actions of lawmakers who are actively promoting legislation against Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), despite claiming to support technological advancements and progress.

The stark and undeniable chasm between the Democrats and Republicans on these critical issues was glaringly apparent throughout the entirety of the hearing. The Democrats, with Foster at the forefront, shamelessly praised these so-called “technologies” as groundbreaking solutions, while the Republicans, under the leadership of Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH), wisely approached them with a healthy dose of skepticism and genuine concern.

Davidson fearlessly exposed the potential dangers lurking beneath the surface, relentlessly interrogating Michael S. Gibson, Director of the Division of Supervision and Regulation at the Federal Reserve, regarding the dubious hiring practices of the San Francisco Fed and Boston Fed in their quest to develop Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).

Gibson adamantly asserted  this endeavor was solely for the purpose of research, vehemently denying any notion  the Federal Reserve was even remotely contemplating its implementation.

Opponents of CBDCs vehemently argue  these digital currencies pose a grave threat to the privacy and freedom of citizens. They fear  the implementation of CBDCs could pave the way for unprecedented levels of surveillance, allowing the government to pry into every transaction made by its citizens.

Furthermore, they express concerns  CBDCs could grant the government an alarming level of control over individuals’ purchasing decisions, potentially infringing upon their personal liberties. In a bold and necessary move, Republican lawmakers have taken a stand against the potential dangers posed by these emerging technologies. With a keen eye for caution and a commitment to safeguarding our society, they have introduced bills aimed at restricting or even outright banning these technologies.

Final Word: If your smart phone is now the carrier of your biometric data, which is soon to be transplantable into your body then who is to say the chip is not a two-way transponder sending subconscious messages to you on a deep level? …….and BTW won’t your phone number be attached to your biometer profile? and what will your new biometric prefix to your new biometric phone number be? ……let me guess…….wait for it…….666 ?


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here