(Tea Party PAC) – Joe Biden’s Press Secretary, Jen Psaki, dismissed questions asked by a New York Post reporter who wanted to know how the current administration navigates its way through conflicts of interest that have been created by the controversial business activities of Hunter Biden.
For those who might not know, Hunter Biden, who is the youngest son of Joe Biden, has deep business connections in both Ukraine and China.
“I’ve got a quick clarification and two questions about presidential conflicts of interest in foreign affairs,” reporter Steven Nelson started to ask, according to a White House transcript of the press briefing. “The first brief clarification is: The New York Times reported this week that the first son remains under criminal investigation. Does the president still intend to stay out of that case?”
“Yes. It’s the Department of Justice, and I would point you to them,” Psaki responded, according to a report from The Western Journal.
“Nelson was referring to reports that the Justice Department is investigating Hunter Biden’s activities,” the report continued.
Nelson then went on to focus on reports that Hunter Biden received $3.5 million Elena, which is also spelled Yelena, Baturina, who is the bride of the former mayor of Moscow, with a massive net worth of $1.4 billion, according to a report from Forbes.
Psaki SNAPS, explodes on reporter like raging volcano for asking about Hunter Biden’s laptop as she uncontrollably spews propaganda
This says it ALL.
— Benny (@bennyjohnson) March 18, 2022
“On Russia: You told me last year that you were unfamiliar with the Senate report that alleged that the first son — or a company linked to the first son received $3.5 million from the richest woman in Russia. Subsequent reporting indicates that President Biden, when he was Vice President, had a dinner in Georgetown with the same woman in 2015,” Nelson continued.
“This — Yelena Baturina, she has not been sanctioned yet by the U.S. government. How is President Biden navigating conflicts of interest when it comes to sanctioning people who have done business with his family? And can you explain to us what this $3.5 million was for?” he went on to ask.
While the allegation was contained in a report from the Senate, Psaki responded, “I don’t have any confirmation of the accuracy of that report, so I have no more further details.”
The reporter then asked how sanctions worked when Russia and China are basically minefields of conflicts of interest.
A good question, right? After all, how stiff can the penalties for these two countries really be when you have a vested interest in them remaining strong economically?
“Can you say anything about the conflicts of interest, though — how he’s navigating those when deciding sanctions?” he continued to push.
“What would be his conflicts of interest?” Psaki asked back.
“Well, his son’s company allegedly got $3.5 million from …” Nelson started off, only to have the press secretary interrupt him, saying she had no confirmation of what he was saying.
She then attempted to call on another reporter, but Nelson refused to be shut down.
“But she hasn’t been sanctioned, though,” he responded, eventually managing to get Psaki’s attention in order to ask the second part of his question.
“My question about the conflict of interests when it comes to China is: Last year, the first son’s attorney said that he divested from a Chinese investment fund controlled by Chinese state-owned entities. We have received not even basic transparency about who bought out his stake, when this happened, and how much money changed hands. Did he actually divest? And if so, can you agree to basic transparency?” he continued.
“He’s a private citizen. He doesn’t work for the government. I’d point you to his representatives,” Psaki stated, once again trying to call on another journalist.
“But there’s a blaring conflict of interest for his father’s role as President, dealing with China,” Nelson pushed once more.
“I think we’re done here,” Psaki stated.
Yeah, that’s how you know she got stumped. There is no good answer that doesn’t incriminate Joe Biden in a clear conflict of interest involving his son’s business dealings in China. This administration is corrupt to the core.
What’s more, they are also incompetent, which means that we have a thoroughly corrupt and completely incompetent administration leading our nation while we are dangling dangerously close to World War III.
Terrifying times, ladies and gentlemen.
Copyright 2022. TeaPartyPac.org
