Panicked Dems Banning Neighborhood Watch Committees

(PCC)Neighborhood Watch Committees are now dangerous heavily armed white supremacist private armies waiting to storm helpless families while posing as safe militias. Balderdash!

In a surprising turn of events, Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Congressman Jamie Raskin (MD-08) have introduced legislation to regulate neighborhood watch committees. The proposed legislation labels these committees labeled as militias and advocates for their prohibition. The proposed Preventing Private Paramilitary Activity Act has ignited a heated debate, with opponents asserting  it infringes upon constitutional rights.

The legislation, as outlined by the Democrats, seeks to create a federal prohibition on paramilitary groups through civil and criminal enforcement. It focuses on activities  involve intimidating state and local officials, interfering with government proceedings, impersonating law enforcement, and violating people’s constitutional rights while armed and operating as part of a private paramilitary organization.

But wait, doesn’t the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights is cited as a constitutional protection for militias, as it guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

Some argue Democrats are displaying a blatant disregard for the U.S. Constitution, but in sharp backlash the response is they are only trying to protect the helpless family who will fall victims to the bloody rage of the White Supremacists.

Senator Markey, in support of the legislation, cited the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol by individuals with white supremacist affiliations and ties to paramilitary groups. He highlighted the concern regarding private paramilitary actors such as the “Proud Boys” and “Oath Keepers” and their potential impact on democracy and the rule of law.

Congressman Raskin and other enlightened progressives expressed similar views, highlighting the importance of preventing another insurrection and safeguarding democracy.

Republican Louisiana Congressman Clay Higgins expressed his strong opposition to the bill, arguing  it encroaches upon individual liberties. He strongly advocated for the freedom of individuals to associate freely, discuss matters of interest, and engage in activities like tactical training without any interference from the government.

Higgins, questioning the legislators’ grasp of tactical training, implied  they may not have the necessary qualifications to dictate the behaviors of citizens. He stressed the significance of individuals’ ability to safeguard themselves and others when confronted with potential threats.

The controversy surrounding this legislation goes beyond the specifics of the bill. Some critics argue  there is an attempt to exert control over everyday activities and behaviors, which could potentially restrict the freedom of citizens.

Final Word: The Democrats don’t give a Rat’s A$$ about families, neighborhoods, and rights they only want to stop ANY resistance against their policies and if they cook the 2024 election to the bursting point they don’t want any way for the citizens to fight back against their tyranny!

“A disarmed people have no rights only masters”  Steve Eichler JD




Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here