(PCC)The idea has been planted, the dog-whistle sounded and the code-talking points released! Dems prepare for a possible Trump win but it appears the liberals are not going to take any chances. Is there a mysterious Epstein or JFK plan in the works? G*d I hope not!
Why is the left NOT talking about if Biden dies? Bidens mental capacities are diminishing, he has had 2 brain surgeries and suffers for a severe sleep disorder while Trump is in excellent physical condition, but it is Trump the left is asking about his premature death!
Why is that?
Concerns arise over media speculation on Trump’s ‘hypothetical demise’ in 2024.
In a stunning display of predictive programming, a recent event has left many questioning the true intentions behind the media’s narrative. The peculiar circumstances surrounding this incident have undoubtedly raised eyebrows and sparked a wave of skepticism among those who refuse to blindly accept the mainstream agenda.
<blockquote class=”twitter-tweet”><p lang=”en” dir=”ltr”>Hi <a href=”https://twitter.com/sonam_sheth?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@sonam_sheth</a> what an odd question to ask about our former President. Did you do this with Biden? <a href=”https://t.co/6ryUSmS4qR”>pic.twitter.com/6ryUSmS4qR</a></p>— Merissa Hansen (@merissahansen17) <a href=”https://twitter.com/merissahansen17/status/1728424033979654368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>November 25, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=”https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=”utf-8″></script>
In a stunning twist, the notoriously left-leaning publication Business Insider has shockingly released an article that has raised serious doubts about their true intentions.
Entitled “The Consequences of a Tragic Demise: Examining the Hypothetical Fallout if Donald Trump Passes Away During the 2024 Presidential Race,” this thought-provoking piece delves into the potential ramifications of the untimely death of the esteemed former president.
In a thought-provoking piece penned by Sonam Sheth, the potential consequences of President Trump’s demise prior to the 2024 election are meticulously examined. Sheth astutely emphasizes the significance of age, as the Republican frontrunner inches closer to the ripe age of 78.
<blockquote class=”twitter-tweet”><p lang=”en” dir=”ltr”>Hi <a href=”https://twitter.com/sonam_sheth?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@sonam_sheth</a> what an odd question to ask about our former President. Did you do this with Biden? <a href=”https://t.co/6ryUSmS4qR”>pic.twitter.com/6ryUSmS4qR</a></p>— Merissa Hansen (@merissahansen17) <a href=”https://twitter.com/merissahansen17/status/1728424033979654368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>November 25, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=”https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=”utf-8″></script>
In the unfortunate event of a potential nomination vacancy, one can’t help but ponder the various strategies fellow Republicans might employ to secure the coveted position. The political landscape would undoubtedly be rife with speculation and intrigue as ambitious conservatives position themselves to seize the opportunity.
Conspicuously overlooked in the article is a glaring omission: a thorough examination of the predicament surrounding Joe Biden, who, at the ripe age of 81, surpasses his opponent by three years and grapples with mounting apprehensions regarding his physical and cognitive capabilities.
The eyebrow-raising article on Trump has certainly caught the attention of many, with its meticulous attention to detail. However, it is worth noting Sheth did touch upon the age-related concerns surrounding Biden in a separate piece. The glaring absence of a parallel headline has raised eyebrows, leading to suspicions about the underlying agenda driving this biased coverage.
This speculative piece conveniently aligns with the prevailing trend of intensifying anti-Trump rhetoric has permeated the media and Democratic circles. As the Biden administration continues to face a sharp decline in approval ratings, astute observers have raised concerns about the timing of this article’s release. It is not unreasonable to question whether there is a deliberate attempt to shift public focus away from the numerous challenges plaguing the current administration.
<blockquote class=”twitter-tweet”><p lang=”en” dir=”ltr”>Hi <a href=”https://twitter.com/sonam_sheth?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>@sonam_sheth</a> what an odd question to ask about our former President. Did you do this with Biden? <a href=”https://t.co/6ryUSmS4qR”>pic.twitter.com/6ryUSmS4qR</a></p>— Merissa Hansen (@merissahansen17) <a href=”https://twitter.com/merissahansen17/status/1728424033979654368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>November 25, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src=”https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js” charset=”utf-8″></script>
The rampant speculation on social media regarding the Business Insider article is indicative of a concerning trend. Many astute users have raised the possibility this piece may be nothing more than a calculated form of predictive programming. It is a well-known tactic employed by those in power to manipulate public opinion by surreptitiously introducing certain scenarios. This raises serious questions about the true intentions behind such articles and the potential impact they may have on shaping public discourse.
The explosive controversy surrounding this article arises amidst a backdrop of incendiary remarks made by influential Democrats. The radical and alarming remarks made by Representative Dan Goldman of New York have sent shockwaves throughout the conservative community. In a stunning display of hostility and disregard for democratic principles, Goldman brazenly suggested President Trump should be “eliminated” prior to the 2024 election.
Such inflammatory rhetoric not only undermines the very essence of our political system, but also reveals a deeply troubling mindset within the ranks of the liberal establishment. It is imperative we condemn and reject these dangerous calls for violence, as they have no place in our society.
In a stunning display of hyperbole, former Senator Claire McCaskill has shamelessly compared President Trump to infamous dictators Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini. Such outrageous and baseless claims only serve to further divide our nation and undermine the credibility of those who engage in such reckless rhetoric.
It is deeply troubling to witness the depths to which some individuals are willing to sink in their desperate attempts to vilify and delegitimize a duly elected leader. Rather than engaging in thoughtful and constructive dialogue, McCaskill’s inflammatory remarks only serve to perpetuate a toxic political climate hinders progress and unity.
Final Word: The liberal super-structure is rattling in fear that just maybe Trump may pull-off a win if so then what? Are they going to Epstein him or JFK him? What type pf people are these who cannot and will not accept what the people want? If they are ‘for democracy’ they must be for disappointment and appointment. If the people speaks then all parties must respect the people voice……that is unless the Dems believe the people can never be right with out them? Hummmm?
Reference: https://www.infowars.com/posts/media-wonders-what-happens-if-trump-dies-in-2024/
